The Lab clarified its policies, procedures and plans for the Second Life birthday celebrations and for all intents and purposes the kids are in - or allowed in, or is it allowed to apply. And the implication is that Gor and other communities are allowed in as well - so long as their builds and participation are PG.
This does NOT mean, however, that the applications will be accepted - just that they’ll give a reason other than “we don’t want to celebrate kids culture” - maybe they can say “Oh, that’s not MUSICAL enough” or “Thanks anyways, but we already have enough photography”.
The Lindens assure us that kids (and all others) can submit applications and that so long as the exhibit idea is PG there are no other reasons for which it will be rejected out of hand. Which isn’t to say they won’t need to draw the line somewhere - IF they actually had so many applications that they needed to make sure their sim didn’t overflow.
However, in addition to opening up the application process to all TOS-compliant residents again, they’ve also both narrowed the topic area and split the field. What was previously a celebration about diversity and culture is now about “stuff”, as if trying to create a handy portfolio of “things you can make in SL” - like music and machinima, although sure they still mention cultures and whatnot, but it strikes me that there’s a greater emphasis on tools than on sociality, which may be a way of making up for the fact that they look like tools for how they’ve handled this whole mess.
The clarification from the Lab is back-peddling. First, they said on Massively that child AVs and others were allowed to attend but not to participate in the builds, now they’ve back-tracked in such an artful way and are allowing anyone to apply or attend, so long as they meet the PG requirements of the sim. Why didn’t they just SAY I wonder - hey, we were wrong. We made a MISTAKE. Anyone can apply who’s in the TOS who submits an idea appropriate for a PG sim. Instead, they slip slide around it like they do so many other things - have no idea how they learned to skate so well in California.
But at the end of the day, this is sensible. There’s a TOS for a reason. Sims are PG for a reason. Anyone with the audacity to say that the Lindens should preclude members of the community who abide by the TOS, who have been active participants in SLC before, and that it’s “OK” to make decisions based on taste, morality, or just - well, gosh, aren’t those little kids creepy, we can’t have THEM around…has lost their bearing.
Linden has a TOS. They have community guidelines. And they can make whatever choices they want about how they promote their platform. But they had no sensible reason to exclude an active, money-paying community. Some said that there’s nothing wrong with keeping the “commons clean of creep” - bullshit. Utter bullshit. It’s a PG build, and it was a PG build when they made the decision in the first place. And what you call creep others call creative, and I sometimes find tails on humans creepy too, but I’m not going to exclude Nekos because of it.
Linden has made a sensible reversal, but they’ve done two other things: one, they’ve still reserved the right to NOT ACCEPT applications, and second they’ve split the community in two by extending the celebrations over two weeks - one for the “culture” and one for the “corporations”.
And let’s face it, this reverse, this change, and the resolution they’ve come to tells you as much as you need to know about where the Lab is at right now - trying to please two separate constituencies, two different target audiences, attract two different communities, appease two different groups.
Corporations, schools, collaboration……and culture, immersion, creativity, and social. Two weeks, two separate streams of events, two different target audiences, and let’s keep them apart, shall we?
The Lab needs the larger culture because there are numbers there, and that pumps up the stats, and it allows them to still make claims about a growing community. But their bread is buttered in the longer term by the companies and universities, and this has been clarified in this new change of heart over how the SL birthday will be celebrated.
In the meantime, what remains to be seen is whether those who felt excluded will even bother.
And what will also be interesting is whether communities that became united in opposition will now split through the Linden’s reversal. Maybe that was partly their intent? Maybe I’m being conspiracy minded about it - but wouldn’t it be interesting if these communities that they just disenfranchised now become split and that all that really ends up happening is a few members of Gor or maybe a few kids are added to the FIC?
Dusan,
It doesn’t matter what sort of avatar you have, everyone interested can submit builds to the Birthday Celebration.
If any submissions aren’t accepted it’ll be because they are too “adult” in nature, not because of the looks of the avatar.
As someone involved in the original brainstorming about adding to the celebration, I assure you that we’re trying to make it more fun and valuable for everyone, full stop.
Thanks,
– Katt Linden
I don’t think that they have clarifies anything.
First the word was kids couldn’t participate.
Then that was “clarified” to mean they could attend but any submissions would be rejected,
Then that was further “clarified” to mean that kids could submit builds, but it couldn’t refer to the kids community in anyway.
Now, the “clarification” is anyone can submit a build as long as it’s PG. Which is all well and good, but the re-wording doesn’t change anything. Just the same thing only worded differently to make it more palatable and try to stem the controversy.
Sorry I don’t buy it.
Tomas
I appreciate the clarification Katt…and it’s nice to see a Linden contribute outside of the LL blog! That means a lot, and the outreach is a really wonderful sign of listening and attempting to clarify, to bring some light to what became a very murky situation.
I’m afraid the comment Tomas made, and perhaps my own slant - is that while it’s good that you’ve clarified, and good that you’re reiterating your desire for the full participation of the community, there’s some skepticism which was probably avoidable. For the sake of moving forward however, I really do accept your assurance, Katt.
I also understand that you do reserve the right to review the applications before you accept them - but the skepticism will be confirmed if there isn’t a pretty valid reason for excluding someone.
I also think that the ’split’ between the two types of representations of the community isn’t such a bad idea either. The Grid is meant to embrace everyone - the power of a virtual world isn’t contained to immersionists or augmentationists it’s a full range, a spectrum - whoever can make something of the tools should be welcome to. However, while this is articulated more globally, I think sometimes mixed signals are sent to the community.
Katt - please stop by more often…or if not here, elsewhere…it really is a different level of engagement than what is often perceived as the “blog and hide” approach that’s sometimes taken on the main site.
OK…now having said all THAT….proof in the pudding and so on…let the celebration preparations begin, wherever you plan to hold them, whether at the official event, your own, or on OpenSim
It seems the reaction of Kids5B will be to proceed with our project and apply with it for the official celebrations. We would set up an info point, maybe with a 3d sculpty model of our SIMs and with staff introducing it. And a TP to our SIMs (where we would invite LL to have a promo place and a TP back to the official SL5B SIMs).
On behalf of many kid avatars, I’d like to thank all who supported us during these chaotic days. It was extremely encouraging to see that we are not alone in this.